![]() |
Types of Learning |
|
Quick Links >>> |
||
|
|
Types of LearningDuring the 1950s, in an effort to make education more systematic, educational psychologists began classifying the types of learning according to the behaviour involved. They identified three domains, and numerous levels of learning within the domains. CognitiveThe cognitive domain involves intellectual learning: facts, ideas, processes, creativity.
AffectiveThe affective domain involves the development of a range of attitudes and values.Receiving: interest, attention, willingness to listen Responding: active participation Valuing: emotional involvement, development of strong opinions Organisation: identifying and resolving conflict between new and existing values Characterisation by value: using a systematic and consistent set of values used to guide behaviour Psychomotor: This involves physical skills and actions such as those required in typing, driving a car or playing sport. This domain is particularly important in trades such as carpentry. Imitation: attempting an action that has been explained or demonstrated Manipulation: a practiced and reasonably proficient action Precision: the action is performed precisely and accurately, with no hesitation or wasted energy Articulation: the action can be modified to suit the situation or solve a problem Naturalisation: the action is automatic, performed without requiring any thought or attention. Learning how to do a job correctly involves the Cognitive (and often the Psychomotor domains.) Willingness to do a job correctly involves the Affective domain. Relevance to learners and trainersTraining that produces learning only to Level 1 in the Cognitive domain can be downright dangerous. It produces people who know much and understand little. The classic example was the woman who made her daughter walk half a kilometre to school on crutches, because, she explained, the child’s ankle was only “fractured” not “broken.”Unless you give learners problems different to the examples, you are limiting the learning to Level 2 of the Cognitive domain. This is not fair to the learners. People with this level learning are not capable of working without close supervision, because they don’t know how to cope with situations other than those covered in detail in training. |
|